Can AI make automated decisions that affect people?
Answered
Yes, but with legal limits. Article 22 restricts solely automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects. The Cabinet Office ADM ethics framework covers both solely automated and AI-assisted decisions and should be applied in full for best practice. Significant automated decisions should get ministerial agreement, with a senior owner for major processes. Do not treat ADM as a fix-all for complex policy problems.
From the guidance
Primary (how) ICO: Article 22 of the UK GDPR and fairness
Section: What is the purpose of Article 22?
Read this in ICO: Article 22 of the UK GDPR and fairness (opens in new tab)
Secondary (normative) ICO: Article 22 of the UK GDPR and fairness
Section: What is the purpose of Article 22?
Read this in ICO: Article 22 of the UK GDPR and fairness (opens in new tab)
Secondary (normative) Data and AI Ethics Framework
Section: Maintain human oversight
Read this in Data and AI Ethics Framework (opens in new tab)
Secondary (normative) AI Playbook for the UK Government
Section: Human oversight
Read this in AI Playbook for the UK Government (opens in new tab)
Secondary (normative) Ethics, Transparency and Accountability Framework for Automated Decision-Making
Section: What we mean by automated decision-making
Related questions
- Do significant automated decisions need ministerial agreement?
- What safeguards does Article 22 require for solely automated decisions?
- Can I use proxy or generalised social datasets for automated decisions about individuals?
- Should we publish algorithms used for automated decision-making?
- Should automated decision-making be the default solution for complex policy problems?