Can I put official or unpublished information into public tools like ChatGPT?
Contrasting
Do not put unpublished official information into public AI tools. Follow department policy. Free/public services may reuse what you submit; paid enterprise tools with DPAs may handle sensitive data — but that is not a green light for public ChatGPT-style tools. Prefer departmental systems and never put personal/identifiable content into unsuitable tools.
Playbook bans unpublished official info in public AI apps. Insights emphasises org policy and provider reuse. Knowledge Hub how-tos say follow department policy, avoid personal/identifiable content, and note that paid enterprise tools with DPAs can often handle sensitive information — creating scope tension across public vs assured tools.
How to navigate this: Playbook ban for public/unassured tools; department guidance for assured enterprise tools; do not conflate the two.
From the guidance
Primary (how) AI Knowledge Hub: Using AI ethically and sustainably
Section: Protect sensitive information
Read this in AI Knowledge Hub: Using AI ethically and sustainably (opens in new tab)
Contrasting AI Playbook for the UK Government
Section: Public AI applications and web services
Read this in AI Playbook for the UK Government (opens in new tab)
Contrasting AI Insights: Generative AI
Section: Public generative AI applications and web endpoints
Contrasting AI Knowledge Hub: Using AI at work
Section: Using AI in government
Read this in AI Knowledge Hub: Using AI at work (opens in new tab)
Related questions
- Do I need to tell the public when we are using AI or algorithms? Lawful, ethical and responsible use
- Are AI meeting transcription tools allowed?
- Should I use a public AI API, a privately hosted model, or a managed platform?
- What controls do I need when calling an external AI API?
- Can I trust generative AI outputs, or do they hallucinate?