Should I publish my DPIA and Equality Impact Assessment?
Contrasting
You still need a DPIA before high-risk processing of personal data. Publishing the completed DPIA is good practice to show you are protecting personal data and considering fairness. Publishing the EIA is also good practice. Redact anything that would be exempt from disclosure.
Data and AI Ethics Framework treats publishing DPIA and EIA as good practice as separate transparency artefacts. LGA guide suggests integrating DPIA with EqIA or into an AIA to streamline, provided all DPIA and PSED requirements are still met.
How to navigate this: Meet all DPIA and PSED substance either way. Merging documents is fine if nothing required is lost; publishing remains good practice for transparency.
From the guidance
Primary (how) Data and AI Ethics Framework
Section: Data protection-related transparency
Read this in Data and AI Ethics Framework (opens in new tab)
Secondary (normative) Data and AI Ethics Framework
Section: Fairness-related transparency
Read this in Data and AI Ethics Framework (opens in new tab)
Secondary (normative) ICO: Accountability and governance implications of AI
Section: What do we need to consider when undertaking data protection impact assessments for AI?
Read this in ICO: Accountability and governance implications of AI (opens in new tab)
Contrasting Responsibly buying AI: a guide for councils in England
Section: What does data protection law require?
Read this in Responsibly buying AI: a guide for councils in England (opens in new tab)
Related questions
- Do I need an Equality Impact Assessment for an AI project?
- Can councils merge DPIA and Equality Impact Assessment for AI buys?
- Do I need a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) before using AI?
- Do I need an Algorithmic Impact Assessment in the UK?
- What should an AI impact assessment cover when buying AI? Buying and building